Art-Management

GEP B023 – Art-management

Educational program

6B02123 – ART-MANAGEMENT

Prior education levels of applicants for admission to the 6B02123 – Art Management educational program, regardless of the specialty obtained, may include:
- College of Music, specialized music school;
- College of Arts, Humanitarian-Pedagogical College;
- variety and circus school; cultural and educational school;
-higher educational institutions (it is possible to get a second higher education on a paid basis).

  I.  CREATIVE EXAM ON THE SPECIALTY «PRESENTATION OF THE PROJECT IN THE ART SPHERE»:

Sample topics for the project:
- Organization of an art project (concerts, festivals, competitions, exhibitions, vernissages, etc.).
- Draft presentation of an art group or performer.
- Organization of a tour of an art group or performer.
- Free topic in the field of the art industry.
Project presentation requirements:
- The project must demonstrate the ability of applicants to work with business plans, project sources and present the author's vision of designing creative events. When preparing a project, it is necessary to take into account the ongoing transformations in the field of culture and entrepreneurship in Kazakhstan;
- The project must be submitted in Microsoft Office PowerPoint;
- The duration of the presentation should not exceed 7-10 minutes.

  II. SECOND CREATIVE COLLOQUIUM EXAM

Includes 3 questions:
Question 1 covers the whole range of theoretical aspects of management and control in the art management system.
Question 2 is connected with the history of Kazakh and world music as a whole.
Question 3 includes the submission of a documentary portfolio (self-presentation) of the applicants with a description of their achievements (including copies of diplomas and documents).
Requirements for creative exams:
– The documentary portfolio must be submitted in Microsoft Office PowerPoint.
– The duration should not exceed 5 minutes
 

Evaluation criteria for
applicants' creative exams
I - creative exam

  33-45 points:
    Criteria for evaluating the creative exam of an applicant for project activities.
I. Criteria for evaluating the implementation of the project according to the technology of project activities:
- the relevance of the chosen topic;
- the depth of disclosure of the topic, fulfillment of the tasks;
- the practical value of the project;
- compliance with the plan;
- the validity of conclusions;
- development and implementation approaches of the project are original and diverse;
- the design of the project is correct and competent.
II Project defense criteria, assessed by the content and mastery of the material of the presented project:
- performance at the exam (mastery of the material of the presented project, clarity, culture of speech);
- the ability to answer questions;
- the ability to defend one's point of view;
- the number of slides corresponds to the content and duration of the presentation (for a 7-minute presentation, it is recommended to use no more than 10 slides);
- the applicant can stay within the time limit (7-10 minutes).
  19-32 points:
I. Criteria for evaluating the implementation of the project according to the technology of project activities:
- relevance of the selected topic in the project is not indicated;
- the topic of the project is not disclosed, the tasks are not fulfilled;
- the practical value of the project is not specified;
- non-compliance with the plan;
- the conclusions are valid but it is not indicated in the project;
- development and implementation approaches of the project are not original and diverse;
- the design of the project is incorrect and incompetent.
II Project defense criteria, assessed by the content and mastery of the material of the presented project:
- performance at the exam (mastery of the material of the presented project, clarity, but lack of a culture of speech);
- ability to answer questions. (incompletely);
- failure to defend one's point of view;
- the number of slides does not correspond to the content and duration of the presentation (for a 7-minute presentation, it is recommended to use no more than 10 slides);
- the applicant exceeds the time limit (7-10 minutes).
  5-18 points:
I. Criteria for evaluating the implementation of the project according to the technology of project activities:
- the relevance of the selected topic in the project is not indicated;
- the theme of the project is not disclosed, failure to fulfill the tasks;
- the practical value of the project is not specified;
- non-compliance with the plan;
- the validity of the conclusions of the project is not provided;
- development and implementation approaches of the project are not original and diverse;
- the design of the project is incorrect and incompetent.
II Project defense criteria, assessed by the content and mastery of the material of the presented project:
- performance at the exam (the applicant does not master the material of the presented project, and lacks a culture of speech);
- failure to answer questions;
- failure to defend one's point of view;
- the number of slides does not correspond to the content and duration of the presentation (for a 7-minute presentation, it is recommended to use no more than 10 slides); (if there are more than 10 slides);
- the applicant far exceeds the time limit (7-10 minutes);
  0-4 points:
                    No project.

Evaluation criteria for
applicants' creative exams
II - creative exam

  When passing the exam, applicants must demonstrate the knowledge of theory and practice of management and company administration in modern conditions. Applicants must demonstrate a level of awareness of the questions posed in the creative exam, knowledge of basic concepts and categories in the field of general and functional management, and knowledge of the relevant terminology in the field of management and marketing.
Criteria for evaluating answers:
Each answer to the question of the exam ticket is evaluated on a 100-point scale:
33-45 points – a complete mistake-free answer with explanatory examples. The applicant gave a correct, competent, detailed, exhaustive reasoned answer, fully revealing the essence of the question posed;
           19-32 points – a sufficiently complete answer with examples but with a few inaccuracies
           5-18 points – an insufficient answer, presence of mistakes and omissions, lack of examples, some gaps in knowledge.
          0-4 points – an incomplete answer or no answer, the presence of mistakes, and significant gaps in knowledge.
The overall score for the exam ticket is calculated as the arithmetic average of the scores for each question.