Мusical theater direction
THE PROGRAM
of the creative examination
Educational program
«6B02124 – MUSICAL THEATER DIRECTION»
I. CREATIVE EXAM IN THE SPECIALTY «SELF -PORTRAIT»:
(all parts are required to execute)
1. «Why do I choose a music theater?» -The text essay on why you want to engage in the music theater, and not cinema, dramatic, Internet art, etc.
2. «Who I am» is a video in which you are the main character. It can be anything:
- My musical addictions. The music of which composer made the greatest impression on you, and perhaps it became an event that changed your life and about which you will talk about in the frame.
- Dream. What kind of musical work I want to put on and why.
- Your monologue about the modern direction of the «Directorate Opera» in the world musical theater.
The duration of the entire video export is 1 minute.
3. «Interview» - the interview checks the ability of the applicant for figurative thinking, its intellectual level, the ability to navigate in the space of world artistic culture and erudition in the field of literature, music, theater, cinema.
Criteria for evaluating
creative exams
for applicants I – creative exam
When passing the exam, applicants should demonstrate knowledge of the theoretical foundations of theory and practice in the field of literature, music, theater, and cinema. Applicants should demonstrate the level of conscious awareness of the questions posed in a creative exam, ownership of basic concepts and categories in the field of directorial work.
Criteria for answering answers:
Excellent:
– a complete unmistakable answer with explanatory examples. Gave the correct, competent, thorough, exhausting reasoned answer, fully revealing the essence of the question;
Good:
– a fairly complete answer with examples, but with slight inaccuracies.
Satisfactory:
– there is not enough complete answer, the presence of errors and omissions, lack of examples, some knowledge gaps.
Unsatisfactory:
– incomplete answer or its absence, the presence of errors and significant knowledge gaps.
II. CREATIVE EXAM IN THE SPECIALTY «DIRECTOR'S TASKS»
(all parts are required)
1. To come up with a poster for any of the popular musical works expressing its essence. Express it in verbal form and put it up in the sheet. It is possible to use any objects, objects, dolls, the main condition is the lack of image of people
Duration-3-5 minutes.
2. The documentary «Interview», whose heroes are your environment (relatives, friends, acquaintances,) struck you with anything (act, beauty, result)
Duration-2-3 minutes.
3. Spatial association. Living decoration. An art environment in which a scene or a fragment from musical works could occur. Your task is to make a video without mounting speakers. There can be people, people and objects or only objects in the frame. The space can be timeless, including modernity, the main thing is that there is a clear associative connection with the essence of the musical work. Be sure to indicate the name and scene.
Duration-5-7 minutes.
Assessment criteria
creative exams for applicants
II - creative exam
Excellent:
Criteria for evaluating the creative exam of the applicant «Director's Tasks».
I. Criteria for evaluating the execution of the task:
- The relevance of the selected topic.
- The depth of the disclosure of the topic, the performance of the tasks.
- The practical value of the project.
- Compliance with the plan.
- The validity of the conclusions.
- originality and variety of development and implementation approaches
project.
- The correctness and literacy of the design.
II criteria for the protection of the project, evaluated by the content and ownership of the material of the presented project:
- performance on the exam (ownership of the material provided
project, visibility, culture of speech)
- The ability to answer questions.
- The ability to protect your point of view.
- the applicant accurately fits into the framework of the regulation;
Good:
I. Criteria for evaluating the execution of the task:
- the relevance of the selected topic in the project is not indicated;
- the topic of the project is not disclosed, not fulfilling the tasks;
- the practical value of the project is not indicated;
- Inconsistency to the plan.
- there is a validity of conclusions, but not indicated in the project;
- there is no originality and diversity of approaches to the development and implementation of the project.
- improper and illiterate design of the project;
II criteria for the protection of the project, evaluated by the content and ownership of the material of the presented project:
- performance on the exam (ownership of the material provided
project, visibility, but there is no speech culture)
- the ability to answer questions (incompletely);
- Inability to defend their own point of view;
- the applicant exceeds the framework of the regulation;
Satisfactory:
I. Criteria for evaluating the execution of the task:
- the relevance of the selected topic in the project is not indicated;
- the topic of the project, failure to fulfill the tasks are not disclosed;
- the practical value of the project is not indicated;
- Inconsistency to the plan.
- the validity of the conclusions in the project is not indicated;
- originality and variety of development and implementation approaches
there is no project;
- improper and illiterate design of the project;
II criteria for the protection of the project, evaluated by the content and ownership of the material of the presented project:
- performance on the exam (does not own the material of the provided
project, there is no speech culture)
- Inability to answer questions.
- Inability to protect your point of view.
- the applicant is much exceeding the framework of the regulation;
Unsatisfactory:
The absence of the project.